Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lithgow, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hepworth, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Performance measurement in prison libraries: research methods, problems and perspectives

Susan D. Lithgow

John B. Hepworth

Describes a research project carried out at the Department of Information and Library Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, to develop a series of performance indicators for use in evaluating prison libraries so as to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of such services. Research completed to date involves a litera ture survey and a pilot study. The purpose of the pilot study was to assess current practice in prison libraries, and involved opinion leader interviews, selection of test sites, structured interviews with prison staff and inmates, observation and monitoring. Having assessed perfor mance indicators, care was taken to allow for the problems arising from the prison regime. Six test sites were involved in the inmate interviewing programme and the aim was to talk to a minimum of 10 per cent of the pop ulation at each test site. Sites included two women's prisons (one open and one closed), and four men's prisons (one dispersal, one category B local, one category C and one Young Offender Institute).

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, 61-69 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/096100069302500202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
A. Curry, K. Wolf, S. Boutilier, and H. Chan
Canadian Federal Prison Libraries: A National Survey
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, September 1, 2003; 35(3): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
IFLA JournalHome page
V. Lehmann
Planning and Implementing Prison Libraries: strategies and resources
IFLA Journal, January 1, 2003; 29(4): 301 - 307.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
A. A.S. McHarazo and A. Olden
Investigating the learning resource requirements of students at the Open University of Tanzania: research methods
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, June 1, 1999; 31(2): 101 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]