This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shiozaki, R. Articles by Eisenschitz, T. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Role and justification of web archiving by national libraries

A questionnaire survey

National Diet Library (NDL), Japan, shiozaki{at}ndl.go.jp

Tamara Eisenschitz

City University, London

This paper reports on a questionnaire survey of 16 national libraries designed to clarify how national libraries attempt to justify their web archiving activities. Results indicate they envisage that a) the benefits brought about by their initiatives are greater than the overall costs, b) the costs imposed on libraries are greater than the costs imposed on stakeholders, and c) all of them are making efforts to respond to legal risks in various ways (e.g. legislation, contracting and opt-out policies) although there are trade-off relations in terms of costs for negotiation, scope of access and size and scope of the web archive. The paper discusses whether a basic logic for justification of their web archiving is valid from the perspective of balancing cost—benefit. Further, it highlights the potential, underlying premises of the logic that motivates the intervention of national libraries as public sector organizations.

Key Words: cost—benefits • legal risks • national libraries • questionnaire survey • web archiving

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 41, No. 2, 90-107 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0961000609102831


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?