Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Library loyalties in limbo

the problems with support mechanisms for library purchasing routines - the case of Sweden

Marie Johansson

Swedish School of Library and Information Science, Centre for Cultural Policy Research, marie.johansson{at}hb.se

The financial pressures experienced by Swedish libraries in purchasing resources are linked to the fact that most of these libraries cannot afford to buy all recent books and must therefore make severe choices in areas where it is not easy to decide on priorities. In Sweden, Bibliotekstjänst (BTJ) is the library service organization that is almost the sole provider of library materials and its dominance is almost total. For many decades, BTJ ran its operation without causing public controversy and was simply looked upon as an uncomplicated service to facilitate librarians’ professional duties. This situation changed drastically as the debate about public library provision, among the public and the profession, gathered strength. The criticisms that were put forward in the debate are described in order to show the complexity of the problems associated with the BTJ system and which, to varying degrees, affect libraries and their practices. The criticisms put forward over the years have almost invariably been aimed at three targets: the readers, the reviews and Sambindningen/BTJ. Sambindningen is roughly translated as Cobinding, a constructed and ambiguous term alluding to both the binding of book volumes and its connecting role between the publisher, the library and the reader. The debate shows that complications exist, for instance, within BTJ and the ownership of the company: a structure which has led to conflicts of interest and a vague delegation of responsibility. It is concluded that problems have been identified associated with the Swedish centralized model for giving support to purchasing routines for libraries. Such problems are also likely to appear in other national contexts using a similar model. The main difficulty is connected to organizational complexities that are difficult to avoid completely when the public service system of the library is confronted with a mediator institution that is linked to the commercial publishing business.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 159-169 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/096100060203400304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?